The Cultural Gutter

the cult in your pop culture

"We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars." -- Oscar Wilde

The Woman in the Costume

Carol Borden
Posted March 1, 2012

“Look for the woman in the dress. If there is no woman, there is no dress.” –Coco Chanel

“The core of the issue for me is the integrity of the superhero and that’s something that I take very seriously and the costume figures prominently in that. It would have to. And that’s why with Star Sapphire, I feel that she’s doing herself a disservice by looking like a trashy drag act.” –Tim Gunn

I used to live just south of Allan Gardens, at the time, a sketchier part of Toronto. Most of the municipal parks were ideal for gay men cruising other men and, thus, generally safe, but, while I lived at that address, Allan Gardens had dealers in it, sometimes police tape and once police tape around a stabbing victim.

If I went out at night, I would never cross through the park, instead I’d angle along the streets bounding it over to the store for juice or chips. And nights when the prostitutes weren’t out, I would turn around and go back home. If it were too dangerous for the pros along Jarvis, it was too dangerous for me. I joked that those women standing over 6 feet tall in thigh high boots and wearing shiny spandex, lurex or vinyl, were superheroes in disguise. And like I said: whenever there was trouble, they disappeared faster than Clark Kent.

While I have written about superheroine costumes in Terra Obscura and Catwoman, I find it disheartening and I really, really want to write about all the interesting things I find in comics. I almost didn’t write this piece because David Brothers and Kelly Thompson have written about superhero costumes so recently,  so well. But I’ve been thinking while watching episodes of Alan Kistler and Jennifer Ewing’s podcast, Crazy Sexy Geeks, in which Project Runway‘s Tim Gunn responds to superhero costumes.  In the October 14, 2011 episode about gender and costumes, Gunn says: “[The costume]‘s also how you know that they’re the superhero.”

And that simple statement comprises my fundamental problem with so many costumes for female heroes and villains, the statement they make about what Coco Chanel called, “The woman in the dress,” or here, “the woman in the costume.”

On the show, they discuss a number of heroes, villains and characters in-between categories.  Two of them have been on my mind for a while now: Star Sapphire, whose new look represents everything I dislike about superheroine costume design; and Power Girl, whose “old” look represented the ur-sexualized costume for many fans. Star Sapphire has been both villain and hero, wielding the power of Love with a jewel (and later a ring) while the Green Lantern Corps harness the power of Will with their rings.  Power Girl is a Kryptonian hero related to Superman.

Star Sapphire’s costume doesn’t say hero, villain, antihero or even  hero-curious.   It says dress tape and don’t move too much.  It says gentlemen’s magazine weird unflattering bikini pin-up.  And Gunn says it says, “superhero porn.” (Apr. 14, 2010) and “trashy drag act.” (Oct. 14, 2011). It reminds me of something a pro would keep under her coat till she was paid–especially the strappy, pubic jewel icon.

I might read a campy adults-only comic about Star Sapphire with a clitoral jewel lit by the power of love, something like Barberella or something with space drag queens or something written and drawn by Colleen Coover, but that would be honest, mature porn or erotica. In its current context, Star Sapphire’s costume does not say superhero or a supervillain and it undermines the integrity of both. (And if Star Sapphire’s power is love, what does this costume say about love?)

The above image  of Star Sapphire with her boot on Hal Jordan’s neck reads less like she is powerful and Hal Jordan is at her mercy, than that Hal Jordan hired a domme for the evening, or maybe a drag queen playing domme. In fact the pose reminds me of Eric Stanton’s femdom illustrations, but softened by the pink, like neither Star Sapphire nor Green Lantern know how to take it any further than a pose.

For her part, Power Girl has a new costume in the DC reboot, but I’m interested in her old one here.  That costume —in particular, the oval cut out revealing cleavage (often called her “tit window”)–became the prime example of problematically sexualized costumes and “fan service” on comment threads, forums and boards, as well as the subject of argument, sadly with very little irony, about “tit window drag.”

I don’t have a problem with the cut-out showing off Power Girl’s cleavage, though I do sometimes have a problem with how her breasts are drawn.  I especially don’t have a problem with her cut-out when there were and are other characters somehow more naked than naked in pink energy.  (Or purple latex:  Catwoman would be fiercer naked than she is shiny and nippleless, let alone shiny, purple and nippleless).  Cut-outs and keyholes are part of everyday fashion; they might be sexy but they are not necessarily vulgar.  A cut-out, by itself, does not require impossible breasts.

Gunn comments: “It just seems that she owns this.  I believe her. I believe this is who she is.” (Apr. 14, 2010).  And I believe her, too.  I believe that Power Girl is a superhero.  Her costume picks up Superman’s colors and riffs on Captain Marvel’s cape, while having its own unique look—blue boots where Superman’s are red, blue gauntlets where Superman’s hands are bare.Her costume reflects her relationship to Superman, but also her different temperament.

There is sex appeal, sure, but there is more.  There is a woman there, a character in that costume and her gloves say, “I will punch you into space.”

And I believe it.

 ~~~

Carol Borden would really love to read a comic where Star Sapphire is a space drag queen.

 

Full Disclosure: Carol recieved review copies of vol. 1 and 2 of Colleen Coover’s Small Favors, but she would’ve linked to it anyway. 

Ryan Sook’s image of Power Girl via Geek Draw.  Wonder Woman/Power Girl double punch via Comic Book Violence.

 

Comments

6 Responses to “The Woman in the Costume”

  1. Carol Borden
    March 1st, 2012 @ 11:54 pm

    Thanks to Screen Editor alex for pointing out the similarity between Star Sapphire’s strange straps and such thongy outfit and the bikini cheesecake shots in Maxim.

  2. Keith
    March 6th, 2012 @ 3:47 pm

    I assume you’ve seen this. In fact, I assume I saw it after following a link from you. But still…

    http://theuniblog.evilspacerobot.com/?p=22720

  3. Keith
    March 6th, 2012 @ 4:29 pm

    Oh yeah — related question. Did you read Garth Ennis’ The Pro? A straight up “this superheroine is dressed like a hooker because she is a hooker.” I know the overarching point was that anyone, given the right chances, could become a hero, but it seems particularly pertinent to the costume debate as well.

  4. Carol Borden
    March 6th, 2012 @ 6:20 pm

    A friend sent me the link and you probably saw it from there. What I always wonder is why the gentlemen who comment never seem to realize that the people who would really enjoy scantily-clad Spider-Man with painted on boots are generally not ladies, but other gentlemen.

    I didn’t, though I appreciate him making a point that could certainly get through even the densest cloud of denial.

    And I’m still not entirely certain that those particular prostitutes weren’t superheroes.

  5. The Woman in the Suit | Mysterious Order of the Skeleton Suit
    March 28th, 2012 @ 5:10 pm

    [...] FULL ARTICLE This entry was posted in Comics and tagged Superheroes. Bookmark the permalink. ← Agent Vinod [...]

  6. The Woman in the Costume | Monstrous Industry
    March 20th, 2013 @ 4:53 pm

    [...] (This piece was originally published on The Cultural Gutter) [...]

Leave a Reply





  • Support The Gutter

  • The Book!

  • Of Note Elsewhere

    Actor Richard Kiel has died. Kiel worked in both film and television, including performances in The Twilight Zone episode, “To Serve Man”; Eegah (1962); The Barbary Coast with William Shatner; Happy Gilmore (1996); Pale Rider (1985); as Vlad in Tangled (201); and as Jaws in The Spy Who Loved Me (1977) and Moonraker (1979).   The New York TimesThe Los Angeles Times and Variety have obituaries. Here he is interviewed with Britt Ekland. And David Letterman interviews Kiel here.

    ~

    Open Culture has a round-up of eight free and complete films by Dziga Vertov, including Man With A Movie Camera (1929) and the first Soviet animated feature, Soviet Toys (1924). (Thanks, Earl!)

    ~

    Matt Zoller Seitz has written a lovely meditation on Robin Williams at RogerEbert.com: “Williams wore the invisible garments of depression. He carried that burden. A lot of the time we didn’t see it, because he was a bright and enthusiastic comic performer and a great actor. But the weight was always there.

    Somehow he lived 63 years.

    What a warrior he was.”

    ~

    At Kaiju Shakedown, Hiroshi Fukazawa interviews director Ringo Lam. “Not as flashy as John Woo, never as hyperkinetic as Tsui Hark, Ringo Lam is one of Hong Kong’s most underappreciated directors. He made his name with sophisticated, downbeat crime dramas that came to define a certain style of urban Hong Kong cinema in the Eighties and early Nineties. After getting his start in television at CTV and TVB, he directed five features before finding his stride with 1987’s City on Fire, the movie that provided the blueprint for Quentin Tarantino’s Reservoir Dogs.”

    ~

    “[Grace] Jones — who was famous not just for her music, but also for her acting and modeling — took Lundgren to New York, where they partied at the legendary Studio 54 and Andy Warhol took pictures of Lundgren. Jones introduced Lundgren to the world of show business. Meanwhile, Lundgren was still set to begin his Fulbright scholarship at MIT. ‘I started sort of thinking, “Wow, this is kind of cool,”‘ Lundgren remembers: ‘”I don’t know if I want to go back to engineering after this.”‘ More at NPR.

    ~

    “A mid-20th century collaboration between artists, poets and printers gave rise to a unique book of surrealistic creatures accompanied by complementary typographic art poems.” See more at BibliOdyssey. (Thanks, Andrezo!)

    ~

  • Spilling into Twitter

  • Obsessive?

    Then you might be interested in knowing you can subscribe to our RSS feed, find us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter or Tumblr.

    -------

  • Weekly Notifications

  • What We’re Talking About

  • Thanks To

    No Media Kings hosts this site, and Wordpress autoconstructs it.

  • %d bloggers like this: