The Cultural Gutter

the cult in your pop culture

"We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars." -- Oscar Wilde

Godzilla vs MechaRealism

Carol Borden
Posted October 10, 2006

Yes, it's a guy in a suit. No, that doesn't mean it's bad.A while ago I watched some Godzilla movies with some people who don’t exactly appreciate the aesthetics of suitmation / kigurumi, or, in less technical language, a guy in a rubber suit. One of the things I like best about Godzilla movies is that as soon as I glimpse Godzilla rising from the depths or appearing behind the mountains, I’m forced to suspend my disbelief.

I’m pretty sure it’s the rubber suit and that suit serves as a reminder that realism might be ascendant, but is still only an aesthetic and not suited to every genre.

I willingly admit that there are downsides to monsters played by guys in suits, but not the one my friends assert—rubber suits are “unrealistic.” I guess that means, “A giant city-devastating monster would not look like that.” My personal problems with rubber suits are encompassed by one monster: Minilla, Godzilla’s son. I don’t know how bad Minilla is in Japanese, but in English he is unbearable. With his googly eyes, hyucking laugh and hokey Davey and Goliath voice, Minilla was made to be dubbed. His anxious jiggling is the precursor to the frenetic wigglings of monsters in live action Japanese superhero shows like Ultraman, Kamen Rider and Mighty Morphin’ Power Rangers. Minilla was invented at a time when Toho had decided Godzilla appealed to children and he is patronizing in every way a corporation can conceive. He’s special friends with a latchkey kid and smoke ring blowing sidekick to Godzilla. The best thing I can say about Minilla is that he calls in to question Godzilla’s sex.

That said, it is funny when, in 2004’s Godzilla: Final Wars, Minilla’s driven around in a Japanese lorry. The scene makes me think of the possibilities of Jim Jarmusch’s Godzilla. John Lurie wouldn’t like Minilla, but he’d give him a lift because someone had to. Lurie’d end up in a conversation with Ifukube Akira at some 24 hour diner while Minilla went off to stop Godzilla destroying the greater metropolitan area.

But Minilla and his radioactive smoke rings cloud the issue. Rubber suits are not off brand computer-generated special effects, they are puppetry. Confronted with a guy in a rubber suit, I suspend my disbelief right quick in a way I don’t with computer generated monsters. Roland Emmerich’s 1998 CG Godzilla forces me to confront its artificiality over and over. Every attempt to make the monster more plausible (it’s a mutant komodo dragon), every little bit of scientific exposition (its atomizing breath is bacterial komodo breath), only kicks me out of the movie, especially since the “bad science” is part of the draw for me. I love the transparencies of Godzilla’s cells and the crazy explanations of “regenerator g-1.” Why make things less fun? Like Wittgenstein says, I like science as a manner of speaking. If you’re looking for a film with realistic aliens and plausible science, go see Contact.

Yes, it's a guy in a suit. No, that doesn't mean it's badEvery realistic explanation about something unreal requires another and Hollywood’s Godzilla becomes all about justifying a giant monster’s plausibility. It distracts from the heart of Godzilla movies. Godzilla is not about what a monster would be like in the real world. Godzilla represents an experience. Until the occupation ended in 1952, the U.S. military censored all representations of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. In fact, U.S. military footage of the cities was not released to the Japanese government, let alone the American public, until 1978. As far as I am concerned, if it’s not about annihilation, it’s not a Godzilla movie.

In Central and South America, writers used magical realism to write about terrifying political realities. Looking at Toho studio’s monsters and armies, I ponder how puppetry trumps direct representation, capturing the simultaneous intentional and impersonal nature of the bombings, deliberate and caused by humans but too totally devastating to comprehend as anything but disaster.

Until a few weeks ago, I would’ve said that CG always threw me out of the movie, at least out of movies with giant monsters traditionally played by guys in rubber suits. But then I saw Bong Joon-Ho’s The Host at the 2006 Toronto International Film Festival. The CG worked fine for a slippery river monster spawned from formaldehyde dumped into Seoul’s Han River, on the orders of a U.S. military commander. What is it about it U.S. military actions that lend themselves to processing through giant monsters?

What part of that’s a guy in a suit don’t people understand? The guy in a suit is a metonym that stands for all the movie’s implausible parts. The guy in a suit reminds us that Godzilla is about something else, maybe has more in common with magical realism or medieval morality plays than science fiction cinema, if you don’t mind me going off half-cocked. If you can’t get over Godzilla being a guy in a suit in the first five minutes, then you are missing the point. Honestly, why attack a genre for its conventions?


Rising from the ashes of thermonuclear devastation, Carol Borden only breathes atomic fire when provoked.


11 Responses to “Godzilla vs MechaRealism”

  1. cordelianne
    October 12th, 2006 @ 6:46 pm

    Fabulous article! I particularly liked the comparisons drawn between Godzilla movies and magical realism and passion plays.

  2. Mr.Dave
    March 18th, 2007 @ 5:57 pm

    Hey, I’m glad to find this article on your website again! It’s one of my favorites that I like to refer to friends; I was looking for it a couple weeks ago but there didn’t seem to be any links on your site to guest article archives.
    Did you know that this article has also been incorporated into a podcast? Check it out or download it at You Will Not Make It In Hollywood: Episode 6 by John Crye.

  3. Beth
    December 24th, 2011 @ 7:59 pm

    AHA!!! Maybe this is why I had so much fun with my first-ever Godzilla movie: 7 years of intensive Bollywood-watching has given me pretty mighty powers of disbelief-suspension. I hadn’t thought about that at all while watching – apparently I have no issues with my symbolism and messages being 100 feet high and itchin’ for destruction. Thanks for steering me over here!

  4. Carol Borden
    December 26th, 2011 @ 3:42 pm

    You’re welcome, Beth. And I’m glad to hear you have found the Godzilla love in your heart.

  5. Rick Hansen (@SmashHansen)
    June 16th, 2012 @ 11:10 pm

    Very enjoyable article, but I think it’s a losing battle. These people have been so conditioned by mainstream Hollywood that their brains are wired to prevent accepting Godzilla as “real”. None of these things are ever “real”, but Godzilla gets the blame. Superman has no means of propulsion. Hulk creates a half-ton of mass out of nowhere. Yet, Godzilla gets all the complaints. I love the Big G, but I’m resigned to the fact that it’s me, my son, you and a handful of other fans out there who can actually grasp what makes these movies so enjoyable.

  6. Less Lee Moore
    July 25th, 2013 @ 11:56 pm

    I am laughing about “anxious jiggling.” And now I’m thinking about Gamera and how he’s a friend to all children. I went through a weird phase where I did Photoshop experiments with the kid in the short shorts from Gamera and Sloan’s Chris Murphy. I’m not proud. It was funny, though.

    The thing about over explaining plausibility and SCIENCE! is exactly what I hated about THE HOLLOW MAN. Don’t even get me started.

  7. Carol Borden
    July 26th, 2013 @ 12:02 am

    It sounds hilarious. You know all those kids in those shorts are in their 40s and 50s now. I wonder what they think looking back. if they do.

    I think I’ve seen Hollow Man. I think it was on Space endlessly and I have this vague memory of cooking dinner while it was on and even the small bit I saw had too much plausibility explaining that undermined the whole thing.

  8. Less Lee Moore
    July 26th, 2013 @ 12:16 am

    I should have also mentioned how much I loved THE HOST! What a fantastic movie.

    If I find those photos, I will share them with you.

  9. Carol Borden
    August 1st, 2013 @ 12:36 pm

    I just re-watched The Host a few weeks ago. So good.

    I would love to see them.

  10. Less Lee Moore
    August 1st, 2013 @ 1:14 pm

    A thorough search reveals they have been lost to the winds of time. So sad.

  11. Carol Borden
    August 3rd, 2013 @ 12:53 pm

    I suppose this means it might be time to revisit such a project…

Leave a Reply

  • Support The Gutter

  • The Book!

  • Of Note Elsewhere

    At Bleeding Cool, Cap Blackard writes about the contested homeworld of Howard the Duck. “If you’ve seen the much maligned Howard the Duck film or read any Howard the Duck stories published since 1979, you’re probably familiar with the concept of Duckworld. You know, an alternate Earth where everyone is ducks and everything is duck-themed: Ducktor Strange, Bloomingducks, etc, etc. Sounds like a recipe for a finite barrel of bad jokes, right? It is, and it’s also not Howard’s real point of origin. During his landmark initial run, Howard’s creator Steve Gerber had the down-and-out duck hailing from a world of talking animals, but all that changed when Gerber was kicked off the book and Disney flashed a lawsuit. Now, after decades of backstory fumbling, Mark Waid has reinstated Howard’s point of origin in a one-shot issue of S.H.I.E.L.D.” (Thanks, Mark!)


    At The Village Voice, Jackson Connor writes about the making of The Warriors. Amid the refurbished boardwalk and laughter of children, it’s easy to forget that Coney Island was once a place where tourists did not venture. For much of the latter half of the twentieth century, street gangs dominated this neighborhood. They ran rampant through the area’s neglected housing projects, tearing along Surf and Neptune avenues toward West 8th Street. Those gangs, or gangs like them, and that incarnation of Coney Island would form the backbone of author Sol Yurick’s 1965 debut novel, The Warriors, about the young members of a street gang. More than a decade after the novel’s publication it would be optioned and, eventually, turned into a major motion picture of the same name.” (via @pulpcurry)


    Edith Garrud taught Suffragettes jiu-jitsu and formed Emmeline Pankhurst’s Bodyguard. “The first connection between the suffragettes and jiu-jitsu was made at a WSPU meeting. Garrud and her husband William, who ran a martial arts school in London’s Golden Square together, had been booked to attend. But William was ill, so she went alone. ‘Edith normally did the demonstrating, while William did the speaking,’ says Tony Wolf, writer of Suffrajitsu, a trilogy of graphic novels about this aspect of the suffragette movement. ‘But the story goes that the WSPU’s leader, Emmeline Pankhurst, encouraged Edith to do the talking for once, which she did.'”


    At Playboy, Jake Rossen writes about the story behind the filming and the restoration of Manos: The Hands of Fate. “For a long time no one wanted to see it unless it was accompanied by MST3K’s taunts. Then, in 2011, a collector of film prints uncovered the original negative of Manos and embarked on an inexplicable project to restore the film with all the white-glove attention archivists give to Hollywood classics. His efforts would incur the wrath of a mysterious man with a fake New Zealand accent named Rupert, as well as Joe Warren, Hal Warren’s embittered son, who intends to preserve the Manos legacy at all costs.” (Thanks, Ed!)


    At Die, Danger, Die, Die, Kill!, Todd reviews the two part Ghanian director Ninja’s film, 2016. “2016 is a movie that I am obligated to review by virtue of my having long ago joined the internet chorus of people trumpeting on about its insane trailer—and this despite the fact that all of you with any interest in seeing it have most likely tracked it down already. In that case, you already know that it is essentially a no-budget remake of Independence Day set in the suburbs of Ghana. And if that sounds like a massive over-reach to you, you obviously know very little about Ghanaian action cinema, and even less about the films of maverick multi-hyphenate Ninja.”

    Read about part one, here, and part two, here.


    Look, it’s the trailer for “The Abominable Snowman” a new episode of classic Thunderbirds. Huffington Post UK has more: “It’s exactly half a century since we heard the ominous tones of voice actor Peter Dyneley bringing us the Thunderbirds intro ‘5 -4 – 3 – 2 -1 Thunderbirds are go’, and to celebrate, the team are producing three brand new original episodes, based on audio-only recordings made in 1966, which means fans will get to enjoy the original voices, with some 21st century gadgetry thrown in on screen.” (Thanks, Todd!)


  • Spilling into Twitter

  • Obsessive?

    Then you might be interested in knowing you can subscribe to our RSS feed, find us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter or Tumblr.


  • Weekly Notifications

  • What We’re Talking About

  • Thanks To

    No Media Kings hosts this site, and Wordpress autoconstructs it.

  • %d bloggers like this: