The Cultural Gutter

dangerous because it has a philosophy

"We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars." -- Oscar Wilde

The Measure Of Success

Chris Szego
Posted November 22, 2012

I’ve been thinking about heroes and archetypes again (which is not actually news: story archetype is a sandbox in which I happily spend a lot of time). Feels like it’s everywhere these days.  A few weeks back I was on a panel at the World Fantasy Convention that discussed love and monsters. Alex and Carol have been examining everyone’s favourite Dark Knight on the Gutter recently.  And this week I was asked in an interview why the Fantasy genre was so popular. I’m pretty sure I babbled a lot, but among other things I told the reporter that it isn’t not just the ‘good vs evil’ paradigm that keeps people reading Fantasy, it’s the heroic.  Not simply in terms of divine power or nobility of action, but in acheiving something against difficult odds.

In other words, success.

That set off a lightbulb.  As humans, we spend much more of our time seeking progress than attaining it.  Which is not a bad thing:  it means we’re not static.  We strive.  And success is what we strive for.  So right now I’m feeling my way around the idea that success is why the Romance genre remains so overwhelmingly powerful.  Why the Fantasy genre is still expanding.  Heck, it’s why sports are so popular.  Think about it.  Professional sports have a fixed time period, an immediate and potentially difficult objective, and a winner.  Success!

Obviously when talking about Romance novels success does not automatically mean a concrete financial gain, career advancement, or the Stanley Cup.  Those things might occur in the story, but as details, not the point.  Much more important is the underlying feeling of accomplishment.  The sense of fruition.  Success is a character taking that step she was afraid to take/ couldn’t contemplate / didn’t know was there… and triumphing.  We treasure that sensation in our lives, so of course we love it in our fiction.

The expressions of success are many, and they vary in size a scope according to every personal situation.  So what does success look like in Romance?  I’ve come up with a few broad categories; there are undoubtedly many more.  But before I get into them I want to make it clear that the happy ending is not, in fact, the measure of success.  It’s the result.  The characters work their way to their happy ending because of the choices they make, because of the obstacles, internal or external, they overcome.  Because they achieve other levels of success along the way.

 

Career 

Yes, all right, two paragraphs up I said that career advancement wasn’t the kind of success I meant.  It’s still not.  But most of us have to work, especially if we like to eat and live indoors and stuff.   Most characters do too.  And, like us, many of them work at jobs that are just okay.  Or possibly less than okay, but pay enough to fulfill their obligations.  Or worse, that don’t pay quite enough so they have to take a second job to scrap by and then are too tired and worn down to even try to find something else…

But sometimes life (aka: The Plot) forces you to reassess what you do for a living.   It isn’t always easy, or pleasant.   It might involve losing a business, or being fired. But when poverty isn’t an issue, having the chance to utterly change what you do can be a real life-changer.  To work at something that challenges and delights – that’s success.

Historical:  This is a tougher category, because although women have always worked, it’s only relatively recently that they got paid. But there are several. Like: Miss Pettigrew Lives for a Day, by Winifred Watson (or watch the excellent movie with Frances McDormand);  The Raven Prince, by Elizabeth Hoyt.

Contemporary:  Burn, by Linda Howard (although this one is about someone who wins the jackpot, she still gets fired and has to start her life anew);  It Had to Be You, by Susan Elizabeth Phillips.

 

Family

How many times have you heard the phrase ‘you can’t choose your family’?  In fact, that’s not entirely true.  You can’t choose the one you’re born into, but you constantly choose the family you create.  I’m always suspicious of a character with no friends.  A story can start that way, with an isolated heroine who has a problem connecting.  But if she finishes with the same stunted social circle, the problem isn’t connecting, it’s her.  Romances often celebrate the many connections we make, with collegues, friends, and partners.

That’s what family is:  the collection of people you want to be with… and also, perhaps, those you need to leave behind. Some families are badly damaged.  Occasionally, that damage can be understood, atoned for, and overcome.  Healed.  In other cases, the strong decision is to cut toxic ties completely.  That’s hard, drastic work, but you can only sail when the anchor’s not weighing you down.

Historical:  At Your Pleasure, Meredith Duran;  Lord of Scoundrels, Loretta Chase.

Contemporary:   Smooth Talking Stranger, by Lisa Kleypas;  No Place Like Home, by Barbara Samuel.

 

Trauma

Ages ago I was in social work.  My clients were teens who had been hurled past ‘at risk’ into ‘danger: quicksand’ without any choice or warning.  Working in those circumstances taught me valuable lesson:  sometimes success is simply an increase in time between catastrophic failures.

People, far too many of them, have pain in their pasts.  Abuses, horrors, losses beyond bearing.  Our whole history as a species tells us that we can survive the truly unthinkable.  But it doesn’t leave us.  It changes us forever and it doesn’t go away.

Romance novels testify that it doesn’t have to.  Characters can learn to thrive, regardless of what cut them down.  They don’t ‘get over’ their past hurts; they learn to grow despite, or around, or through them.

Historical:  The Black Hawk, by Joanna Bourne;  Always a Temptress, by Eileen Dryer.

Contemporary:  Carolina Moon, by Nora Roberts.  And the entire ‘In Death’ series she writes as J.D. Robb.  The main character, Eve Dallas, built herself a purposeful life out of the wreckage of her past.  But that past remains with her.  Sometimes the jagged edges are close and cutting;  sometimes they’re mere background noise.  No matter the circumstances, Dallas goes on.  She lives, works, and keeps making choices that help her do both to the best of her abilities.  Watching her grow and change over the course of the series has been a definite education.

 

Funny thing about success: it can be addictive.  In bad ways, which leads to things like wars, and the sub-prime mortgage crisis.  But also in the manner of inspiration.  We can look at other people’s trials — even when they’re fictional — and take pleasure in their successes.  And even, possibly, learn to find our own.

 

 

That said, Chris Szego prolly wouldn’t mind if success came with even a few financial dividends. That’d be okay.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comments

6 Responses to “The Measure Of Success”

  1. Mary McFarland
    November 23rd, 2012 @ 6:27 am

    Chris, spot on. How can we write characters without families (even those who’ve all been murdered, as in the novel I’ve just completed), or friends? They exist in some kind of vacuum? What! This essay is packed with wisdom. I hope you do get paid.

  2. Chris Szego
    November 23rd, 2012 @ 11:22 am

    Thanks Mary.

    (and yes, we do)

  3. NefariousDro
    November 24th, 2012 @ 10:05 am

    I found your insights into the idea of success as a motivation for reading a book a fascinating idea, one that I’d never really considered before. It really makes alot of sense though, so I’d consider the article a, well you get the idea.

  4. Chris Szego
    November 24th, 2012 @ 11:53 am

    It’s not the only motivation, of course. But I do think it’s one of the reasons we come back to the same kinds of story.

  5. Carol Borden
    November 25th, 2012 @ 3:15 pm

    this is a fantastic line: “sometimes success is simply an increase in time between catastrophic failures.”

  6. C. Margery Kempe
    November 26th, 2012 @ 2:27 pm

    A loving and supportive family is part of the fantasy sometimes. Well put, and Watson’s novel doesn’t get near enough notice.

Leave a Reply





  • Support Gutterthon 2015!

  • The Book!

  • Of Note Elsewhere

    The Projection Booth watches Night Moves (1975) with special guest host the Gutter’s own Carol. “Arthur Penn’s Night Moves (1975) stars Gene Hackman as Harry Moseby, a private eye trying to find himself in a post-Watergate America. We’re joined by Nat Segaloff, author of Arthur Penn: American Director and Carol Borden of the Cultural Gutter.”

    ~

    At Graveyard Shift Sisters, Ashlee Blackwell considers love in Ganja & Hess. ” It is up to the viewer to map a path that suits their understanding. What writer/director Bill Gunn (who plays Dr. Hess’ assistant) wanted was a disruption of mainstream fare. Gunn didn’t seem too interested in what Hollywood desired, and like many writers, wrote a screenplay that felt personal and needed to be written. It tackles so many themes, it’s almost difficult to begin. While most rely on it being vampiric and about addiction, it’s important to note the journey that Hess and Ganja embark on together. Their romantic entanglement may by one of the most fascinating aspects of the film that is commonly overlooked because it is challenging to simplify.”

    ~

    Friend of the Gutter Less Lee Moore interviews friend of the Gutter Colin Geddes about his work on the new horror streaming service, Shudder.

    ~

    The Bowery Boys Podcast dedicates an episode to New York City in the history of comic books. “In the 1890s a newspaper rivalry between William Randolph Hearst and Joseph Pulitzer helped bring about the birth of the comic strip and, a few decades later, the comic book.  Today, comic book superheroes are bigger than ever — in blockbuster summer movies and television shows — and most of them still have an inseparable bond with New York City.”

    ~

    Pornokitsch’s One Comic Podcast looks at Red Sonja #10: “To everyone’s surprise, despite some of the covers and the character’s reputation, this isn’t the exploitative boobs’n’swordplay production it could have been. How did it achieve that? Listen and find out.”

    ~

    Los Angeles Magazine has a gallery of self-portraits of Bunny Yeager and a bit about the career of a model and photographer most famous for her pin-up photographs of Bettie Page. “Having dedicated her life to photography and modeling, not to mention publishing 30 books on the subject (one of which shares a name with the Gavlak exhibition), Yeager had an influence on a generation of artist-photographers including Diane Arbus and Cindy Sherman. Arbus even went as far to call her ‘The world’s greatest pin-up photographer.'” (Thanks, Stephanie!)

    ~

  • Spilling into Twitter

  • Obsessive?

    Then you might be interested in knowing you can subscribe to our RSS feed, find us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter or Tumblr.

    -------

  • Weekly Notifications

  • What We’re Talking About

  • Thanks To

    No Media Kings hosts this site, and Wordpress autoconstructs it.

  • %d bloggers like this: