The Cultural Gutter

hey, there's something shiny down there...

"We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars." -- Oscar Wilde

Author’s Cut, Courtesy of the Ebook Revolution

James Schellenberg
Posted May 17, 2012

Recent fantasy novels seem to spend a lot of time describing their magic systems – who can use magic? how does it work? and at what cost to the magic user? C.J. Cherryh’s Rusalka is, in most senses, no exception to this, since these questions are answered quite clearly. That said, Cherryh’s answers have some really interesting things to say about magic.

Rusalka was first published in 1989 (much more detail about this below), and was the first of three books that Cherryh wrote based on pre-Christian Russian mythology. It makes for an unusual flavour for a fantasy novel, since I can only think of one or two other examples in the genre that use the same background. What’s more, Rusalka is essentially a chamber piece, which might be a bit of a surprise for fans of Cherryh’s space operas filled with galactic intrigue. The small scale of the setting really suits the book, however.

Briefly: Sasha and Pyetr are two young Russian lads on the run from their home village, mainly due to Pyetr getting caught up in some intrigue between a rich old man and his young wife. Pyetr is bleeding from a sword wound in the abdomen, and all of his rich young dandy friends have deserted him. Why would a frightened and naive stable boy like Sasha help him?

Simply put, Sasha has always been the odd boy out in the village, due to a reputation for bad luck. As it turns out, this bad rep is due to his unfocused magical powers. After a long and painful trek through some spooky woods, the two young men stumble across a cottage where an old man with wizardly powers lives. Sasha might be able to get help, get some focus, but the old man is caught up in some terrible complications of his own. I won’t spoil the book’s surprises, since there are some great moments in this section.

The main problem proposed by the plot and Rusalka‘s system of magic: those who have magical capacity can affect events and people with… wishes, either consciously or subconsciously. This is at once both simple and deadly. On the best of days, this sounds like a nice ability to have. In the context of family love and despair, revenge from beyond the grave, deadly river monsters, and all the other great stuff that starts happening, wishes take on a different cast.

I loved this section of the book, as you start to get a sense of how screwed up the situation gets, and how quickly it does so, especially when multiple powers and personalities are at work. The cross-currents in one little cottage get rather dizzying. Lots of other fantasy novels have tried to impress me with the scale and scope of their magic systems, but Rusalka is the first book I’ve read in a long time that made me almost physically cringe in response to the implications of what is happening. Wishing is way too easy, and way too easy to mess up. It’s like the monkey’s paw exploded into infinity… not good at all!

As I mentioned, Rusalka was published almost 25 years ago, and I’m reading it now because the author, C.J. Cherryh, has rewritten the book extensively and re-released it as an ebook (she is doing the same for two subsequent books as well). About two years ago here on the Gutter, I wrote about the difference between director’s cuts in the realm of movies and the theoretical equivalent in books, but I didn’t think the book side would happen very often:

Generally speaking, I think books get released in a state that’s pretty close to how their author intended; if that’s not the case, then the author hardly ever gets a chance to correct the situation. If a setting or character becomes popular, a sequel seems to me to be more likely than a re-done version of the original story.

Cherryh’s revamp of the series definitely falls into this category, although it might still be the exception that proves the rule. In any case, it’s a pretty interesting project that would not have had the same reach before ebooks. In the same way that DVDs paved the way for lots of extra features and varying versions, maybe ebooks will let authors revisit books and fix them up again. As for Rusalka, why would Cherryh want to create an author’s cut? From the link above:

Rusalka et al is a set of books once published under identical titles—but different. I wrote these books in a period when I was struggling with family illnesses, and I always wanted to revise them into something better. I’m excited to finally have that opportunity.

Cherryh wrote up a few more details here.

I’ve been keeping my eye on ebook-related developments, since I get the sense that big things have been happening recently, and by big things I mean indie/homebrew/author-run ebook stores like the Closed Circle (the store run by Cherryh along with Jane Fancher and Lynn Abbey). A few other ebook projects to keep an eye on include Rudy Rucker’s Transreal Books and the Book View Cafe collective. Publishing ebooks yourself is not for the faint of heart: Rucker had a series of posts on the topic, and at BVC, Linda Nagata just posted some material about the nuts and bolts of the ebook store itself (and Nagata has all of her books available – I remember immensely enjoying The Bohr Maker, so I think I might revisit her works next). Cherryh has posted lots of material about her struggles with ebook mechanics too, so the process is not without drawbacks.

In another series of items of interest here on the Gutter, I’ve been working my way through a list of authors who keep up worthy blogs. Cherryh was one of the first authors whose blog I ran across, way back when. Some recent posts of interest include an eye-opening overview of submitting manuscripts, and the aforementioned post about fighting with ebook formats. Cherryh includes lots of personal details which not everyone will be interested in… my favourite of this type of post includes this gem:  “We have fixed a drain 3 plumbers and the best plumbing supply store in town swore couldn’t be fixed.”

Comments

5 Responses to “Author’s Cut, Courtesy of the Ebook Revolution”

  1. James Schellenberg
    May 17th, 2012 @ 9:28 pm

    If I may add a long quote from the prefatory matter of the Rusalka ebook, it will explain a lot of my good will towards Closed Circle and others like Transreal and BVC that do things in a similar manner:

    “All proceeds from a Closed Circle book directly to the author(s).”

    “The logo page following indicates this work is authentic, hand-edited and prepared as an e-book by the author and artist, through Closed Circle Publications…”

    “If you find yourself somehow in the possession of an unauthorized file of this or any other of the author’s works, the author will thank you if you drop by http://www.closed-circle.net and make a contribution to the author’s livelihood.”

  2. Chris Szego
    May 18th, 2012 @ 10:26 pm

    I remember reading RUSALKA fairly young and being kinda traumatized. Can’t even remember why; just remember the feeling.

    Now I’m a little afraid to read the re-write.

  3. Carol Borden
    May 24th, 2012 @ 4:01 pm

    I really like this line: “It’s like the monkey’s paw exploded into infinity… not good at all!”

    So not good.

    And I also think it’s neat that just when you were pondering the possibilites of authors’ cuts, one pops right up. Use your wishes wisely–and not when you are grumpy and half-asleep.

  4. Carol Borden
    May 25th, 2012 @ 2:37 pm

    check out the wonderful Bilibin “Rusalka” illustration i used for the Tumblr version of this!

    http://culturalgutter.tumblr.com/post/23743379319/at-the-gutter-authors-cut-courtesy-of-the-e-book

  5. AUTHOR’S CUT, COURTESY OF THE EBOOK REVOLUTION | Mysterious Order of the Skeleton Suit
    May 29th, 2012 @ 2:33 pm

    […] FULL ARTICLE This entry was posted in Books & Literature and tagged Ebooks. Bookmark the permalink. ← WHO’S YOUR DOCTOR? […]

Leave a Reply





  • Support The Gutter

  • The Book!

  • Of Note Elsewhere

    Anne Billson has posted a 1985 interview she did with director George Miller (the Mad Max films). Miller talks about many things including Aunty Entity’s probable past as a hero and Max as, in Mel Gibson’s words, “a closet human being.” (Thanks, Matt!)

    ~

    At New York Magazine, David Wallace-Wells writes about bees, colony collapse disorder and beekeeper Dave Hackenberg. “It’s been a long decade for bees. We’ve been panicking about them nonstop since 2006, when beekeeper Dave Hackenberg inspected 2,400 hives wintering in Florida and found 400 of them abandoned — totally empty. American beekeepers had experienced dramatic die-offs before, as recently as the previous winter in California and in regular bouts with a deadly bug called the varroa mite since the 1980s. But those die-offs would at least produce bodies pathologists could study. Here, the bees had just disappeared. In the U.K., they called it Mary Celeste syndrome, after the merchant ship discovered off the Azores in 1872 with not a single passenger aboard. The bees hadn’t even scrawled CROATOAN in honey on the door on their way out of the hive.”

    ~

    Andrew Nette has a pair of interesting pieces on pulp you might be interested in. First, he writes about “the New Pulp” and a bit about Fifty Shades of Gray in “Fifty Shades of Pulp.” Then he writes about pulp and literacy and furthering social advancement in “Pulp and Circumstance.”  “Most people view pulp as either exploitative lowbrow culture or highly collectable retro artefact. Yet pulp has a secret history which Rabinowitz’s book uncovers. Her central thesis is that cheap, mass-produced pulp novels not only provided entertainment and cheap titillating thrills, but also brought modernism to the American people, democratising reading and, in the process, furthering culture and social enlightenment.”

    ~

    The Projection Booth interviews actor Ed Asner.

    ~

    Transcript from BAFTA’s tribute to director Johnnie To, “Johnnie To: A Life In Pictures.” It’s a great interview with To about his films and process. “Like when I made The Mission I didn’t have a script. It was 1999 and I didn’t have any money so we went to Taiwan and they gave us very little money to hurry up and make a film, so without any script we just started making it. And after 19 days we made the film.” (Thanks to the Heroic Sisterhood!)

    ~

    A gallery of sweet geeky art from Native American artist, Jeffrey Veregge. “My origins are not supernatural, nor have they been enhanced by radioactive spiders. I am simply a Native American artist and writer whose creative mantra in best summed up with a word from my tribe’s own language as: ‘taʔčaʔx̣ʷéʔtəŋ,’ which means ‘get into trouble.'”

    ~

  • Spilling into Twitter

  • Obsessive?

    Then you might be interested in knowing you can subscribe to our RSS feed, find us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter or Tumblr.

    -------

  • Weekly Notifications

  • What We’re Talking About

  • Thanks To

    No Media Kings hosts this site, and Wordpress autoconstructs it.

  • %d bloggers like this: