The Cultural Gutter

taking trash seriously

"We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars." -- Oscar Wilde

But Will Your Parents Play?

Andrew Smale
Posted December 21, 2006

A crucial turning point for video games.Based on the reaction to the November launch of the Playstation 3 and Nintendo Wii through sales and media attention, it’s clear that gaming as a cultural phenomenon has cemented itself into the collective consciousness. Local news media observed in awe as the faithful lined up outside their local electronics retailer at midnight in order to be the first to get their sweaty mitts on the latest and greatest console gaming had to offer. Though like the theatrical release of Star Wars: Episode I or The Lord of the Rings, the attention garnered by this event was more human zoo-like spectacle than genuine interest.

Since both console launches occurred in the lucrative pre-Christmas period, they are immediately associated with this year’s “must have” gift list for parents, whether their kids are asking for them or not. In this manner, the console is treated as a kind of novelty item — they are “games” or “toys” first and foremost, never an “entertainment console” as the manufacturers so desperately want them to believe. To the average consumer and mainstream media outlet, they are hardly worth considering for serious entertainment value, let alone thoughtful criticism. Like the latest technology fad, they are merely objects; the culture that goes with them is rarely understood and cast aside as a quirky byproduct of the growing obsession with integrating electronic devices into everyday life.

As with any story, once the newsworthy part goes away, the subject fades back into obscurity. The box office results are tallied. Coldplay will be playing to a sold out crowd at the Air Canada Centre. And life continues as usual until the next high school shooting spree, where game culture is dragged out again for prodding (or flogging, depending on how you look at it). Game culture certainly has no problems getting attention, but does it have the respect from society at large? Not yet, but Nintendo is trying to get it there.

wii-wins-large.jpgWhen Nintendo revealed the controller for the Wii, the popular opinion in the gaming community was that they were clearly losing touch with reality. Abandon the traditional controller? Preposterous! Wave a TV remote around like a wand to control the action? Ridiculous! No self-respecting gamer would substitute skill with the controller for actual physical execution. Except this is exactly what the reaction was to the Nintendo DS, and with this year’s redesign it has found its way onto the Christmas lists of parents and kids alike.

In a recent family holiday gathering, I was talking with my Aunt and Uncle, who had returned from visiting my cousin and his wife in San Jose. My cousin works for a company that was responsible for designing the wireless functionality of the Wii controller. After the product launch, every member of the product team was given a Wii. Having heard the excitement over the console’s launch and its scarcity in the weeks leading up to Christmas, my Uncle asked to see what the fuss was about. They loaded up the bundled Wii Sports and started to play. And they kicked my cousin’s ass at tennis.

The interesting part of the conversation was how they described the experience. It was like they had actually played a game of tennis, or baseball, or bowling. They spoke of how it requires skill to aim the bowling ball correctly, as a slight turn of the wrist will actually cause a gutter ball. They laughed at how hard my cousin swung the Wii controller after losing the ninth straight tennis match. There was a sense of accomplishment behind their encounter with this console; they weren’t just staring at a screen and trying to memorize button combinations. It was intuitive.

The use of physical movement with the Wii adds an entirely new dimension to playing a video game, in stark contrast with the Playstation 3 and Xbox 360’s incremental graphics upgrade and conventional, violence-centric titles. Not to say that the Wii won’t have its share of gun-toting and sword-wielding games, because those games are pretty much guaranteed sellers. The difference is that along with those games, Nintendo is once again filling out its library with ones that have a much wider appeal. It may seem “soft” in comparison with the other two console manufacturers, but they’re casting a wider net as a result.

Indeed, the opinion of mainstream media regarding games in general may be slow to change, but Nintendo is smartly waging the war from outside the typical demographic. With the Wii, they are attracting an audience that would never think to touch a video game console, and building on the strengths of Nintendo’s family-friendly and multi-player experiences. Even this year’s “Touch Generations” ad campaign extolling the virtues of the portable DS to those outside of the 18-34 demographic has their competitors watching closely (and in the case of Sony’s PSP, wondering what happened). As we start to see only slight improvements to a console’s visuals every year at E3 while the gameplay essentially remains the same, Nintendo is looking at the big picture. There is already a well-established audience for video games — they’re young and they aren’t going anywhere. But what about the former hardcore gamer that now wants to share their love of gaming with their offspring? Or the family that wants something to enjoy with their kids that doesn’t encourage anti-social behavior? Or the retired couple that wants something other than bridge to play with their friends? They may never play anything besides Wii Sports, but they’ve still bought a Wii.


2 Responses to “But Will Your Parents Play?”

  1. James Schellenberg
    December 27th, 2006 @ 11:51 am

    I’ve been watching the whole Wii thing – it’s fascinating. I can’t believe how many of the hardcore gamers that I know are already won over! And most of them are busy spreading the word – mainly through demoing the actual games on the actual machines. They go back to playing Gear of War or whatever, leaving a trail of people who wouldn’t otherwise play games all hooked. And moving out of the core demographic was the holy grail for so many years for so many companies, so much time was spent strategizing, and now there’s a glimmer that it might happen. Mind you, I don’t work for Nintendo or anything, but I’m still curious to see how far this goes.

  2. Joey Thompson
    January 4th, 2007 @ 11:52 pm

    Wii agree, the Wii hits on what games were supposed to be about. I just recently played Mega Man 2 (for NES) for 6 hours straight. Why? Because it was fun, not because it looked good. Too many games have focused on how it will look instead of how it will play. I’m glad to see someone out there in the gaming industry still gets it.

Leave a Reply

  • Support The Gutter

  • The Book!

  • Of Note Elsewhere

    At The Village Voice, Jackson Connor writes about the making of The Warriors. Amid the refurbished boardwalk and laughter of children, it’s easy to forget that Coney Island was once a place where tourists did not venture. For much of the latter half of the twentieth century, street gangs dominated this neighborhood. They ran rampant through the area’s neglected housing projects, tearing along Surf and Neptune avenues toward West 8th Street. Those gangs, or gangs like them, and that incarnation of Coney Island would form the backbone of author Sol Yurick’s 1965 debut novel, The Warriors, about the young members of a street gang. More than a decade after the novel’s publication it would be optioned and, eventually, turned into a major motion picture of the same name.” (via @pulpcurry)


    Edith Garrud taught Suffragettes jiu-jitsu and formed Emmeline Pankhurst’s Bodyguard. “The first connection between the suffragettes and jiu-jitsu was made at a WSPU meeting. Garrud and her husband William, who ran a martial arts school in London’s Golden Square together, had been booked to attend. But William was ill, so she went alone. ‘Edith normally did the demonstrating, while William did the speaking,’ says Tony Wolf, writer of Suffrajitsu, a trilogy of graphic novels about this aspect of the suffragette movement. ‘But the story goes that the WSPU’s leader, Emmeline Pankhurst, encouraged Edith to do the talking for once, which she did.'”


    At Playboy, Jake Rossen writes about the story behind the filming and the restoration of Manos: The Hands of Fate. “For a long time no one wanted to see it unless it was accompanied by MST3K’s taunts. Then, in 2011, a collector of film prints uncovered the original negative of Manos and embarked on an inexplicable project to restore the film with all the white-glove attention archivists give to Hollywood classics. His efforts would incur the wrath of a mysterious man with a fake New Zealand accent named Rupert, as well as Joe Warren, Hal Warren’s embittered son, who intends to preserve the Manos legacy at all costs.” (Thanks, Ed!)


    At Die, Danger, Die, Die, Kill!, Todd reviews the two part Ghanian director Ninja’s film, 2016. “2016 is a movie that I am obligated to review by virtue of my having long ago joined the internet chorus of people trumpeting on about its insane trailer—and this despite the fact that all of you with any interest in seeing it have most likely tracked it down already. In that case, you already know that it is essentially a no-budget remake of Independence Day set in the suburbs of Ghana. And if that sounds like a massive over-reach to you, you obviously know very little about Ghanaian action cinema, and even less about the films of maverick multi-hyphenate Ninja.”

    Read about part one, here, and part two, here.


    Look, it’s the trailer for “The Abominable Snowman” a new episode of classic Thunderbirds. Huffington Post UK has more: “It’s exactly half a century since we heard the ominous tones of voice actor Peter Dyneley bringing us the Thunderbirds intro ‘5 -4 – 3 – 2 -1 Thunderbirds are go’, and to celebrate, the team are producing three brand new original episodes, based on audio-only recordings made in 1966, which means fans will get to enjoy the original voices, with some 21st century gadgetry thrown in on screen.” (Thanks, Todd!)


    At the Guardian, Elizabeth Day talks with Geena Davis about feminism, sexism in the film industry and the Geena Davis Institute on Gender in Media. “I mean, it’s freaky when you start examining it. For decades it’s been the same ratio – we’ve all grown up on that ratio. Could it be that women’s presence stalls at about the rate of female participation in the fiction that we watch? Could it be you get to that level and you feel done? That that looks normal? It’s just a completely unconscious image that we have in our heads that women only need to take up a certain amount of space and then we’ve done right by them.”


  • Spilling into Twitter

  • Obsessive?

    Then you might be interested in knowing you can subscribe to our RSS feed, find us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter or Tumblr.


  • Weekly Notifications

  • What We’re Talking About

  • Thanks To

    No Media Kings hosts this site, and Wordpress autoconstructs it.

  • %d bloggers like this: